This hearing was somewhat encouraging. We do need a new regulatory agency, because the challenge is too big for Congress to keep up with and move swiftly enough to correct.

One regulation I want to see is a label requirement for every product or business that uses AI. People should know if something they are buying is created with A.I., just like we require the Country of Origin of Products to be disclosed.

Do you mean the printing press that was used slave sales notices and Playboy

It's nice to see this as more of a discussion, the questions weren't hostile, there was no left or right wing motive, Sam looked relaxed, it felt so much more mature. It's a shame previous hearings were not as good. Maybe it's the members asking the questions, maybe they're learning, or maybe they're going in with a more open mind.
Mr Graham maybe needs to wind his neck in a bit and let people speak. I know there's a time limit, but let IBM expand.

The discussion should have been about openAI and not chatgpt

Sam Altman: Hello ChatGPT, tomorrow I will have a congress about the safety and risks of using you. Can you help me draft a credible speech?
Chatgpt after 2 seconds: Of course! I'd be happy to help you draft a credible speech for your congress on the safety and risks of using me. Here's a starting point:

Lindsey graham is the WORST

If you loose jobs, then you lower interest rates. lower rates more harshly effects the rich and benefits the poor.

Why don't we put ChatGPT on the stand? By the way, none of the members of congress know anything about reversible computation, so they need to do some basic reading before embarrassing themselves. RC is the future of computing. People will be much better off if they actually realize this instead of worshipping their own ignorance.

That was great up until the last guy… what a bigot. he had no respect for the woman, would not let her speak at all, seemed to have an ego bigger than the entire room.

Regarding drone decision making (fear of accidental innocent deaths via automated drones) this kinda has nothing to do with chat GPT and this fool is trying to punch down on Altman treating him like it is. Would the military have AI built to auto pilot their drones that is built on a chat bot or large LANGUAGE model? No. LOL. Some people just fear what they do not understand.

Yes, it needs to be regulated, but more than that, humans need to be EDUCATED.

Chat GPT can ASSIST with that.

The US should focus on real world risks not hypotheticals. The country is facing some of the biggest drug epidemics and mass shootings in history but a productivity tool is in the spotlight.

The government is more concerned about their Elecction reults I see….

The guy who knows most about what his companies technology could do is pretty much the most concerned and the biggest advocate for regulation. He's the right person to be in charge and maybe we should be more concerned than him

They just need to stop development of AI till the point where humans can integrate with computational power of AI. Simple.
They should ask questions like," Can AI over throw government's"?, why is all the focus on content creation and helpful tools, etc ?
Also the last bit feel like Mr Graham will be a first target for AI as he drove the point across simply, bypassing Altman's farse of keeping human race calm till AI becomes self aware and destroys us all.

Did the group of congress people from the TikTok hearing got lost on the way? These guys are miles more congruent and on the ball

"To quote chaptGPT" ? Um…beep bop boop…does not compute.

Such ashame for human right freedom and liberty, american regime is doing the same thing other country do to protect themselves and claim other not democracy.