What is wrong with the microphone quality?

Not bothering watching this based on the comments mentioning the lack of 7900XTX comparison.. do better

you guys finding anything at msrp?

Weird release the 4080 super. The 4070 super is about 15% faster and a similar % more expensive where i am, than a 4070. Its like a tier of 4070, not competing with the 4070. The 4080 super is hardly faster and about the same price as a 4080 and more a 4080 replacement than tier of 4080.

Been waiting for a 4080 Super with 16GB and 10-20% more performance with a cut-down 4090, the A.I. chip "war" didn't let it happen, now I'm going with the 4070TiS as the 16GB VRAM bump is what I need for 4K gaming;
Funny enough I'm replacing my 2070S with it, so kinda poetic no? XD

10:00 Bad data and bad graph sticks out like a sore thumb.
Comparing different makes and models from their own hotspot output is a grossly irresponsible comparison. Those thermistor groups are only calibrated with the accuracy required for relative power and fan control of it's own VBIOS, not for this form of analysis.
Graph also clearly shows outlier spikes, suggesting an issue with testing methodology.
Cropped Y axis and lack of error margins also makes a difference of 8°C look huge when it's functionally inconsequential.
I can't even really see why this is in the video in this context unless LTT is specifically trying to find a way to visually suggest "AMD cards run 20% hotter" without saying such a blatent misrepresentation.

In most scenario it's only upto 30% bump on 30-series vs 40-series. DLSS 3.5 might boost but it's not native res 2k or 4k. 1080p mostly . seems 40-series looks to be a re-launch of 20-series pricing . When 50-series launch asking for 1kw psu not a viable for most. GPU's are consuming 2-4 times total system power not a optimised. I understand it's driving so much pixel and textures rendering for Smooth play. I didn't noticed when changing the setting downscaling res on DS2 actually lowered the power consumption by a considerable margin of upto 40% less usage. Future cards shouldn't demand more power from psu rather it has to be low power card with 1.5x upto 2x in terms of performance.

4080 super? more like 4080 super waste of money.

So to recap all graphics cards are either over priced and underpowered and its best to wait till the next gen arrive when you can tell us they are overpriced or underpowered. I shall stick with my 1080 and yes I should have waited for the 1080ti. Is it possible to buy any pc without buyers remorse?

The 4070 Super was the only interesting card and they crippled the vRAM !

the 1080ti was that last good card that was made by nvidia

I am happy to see that you finally started to include ML benchmarks in GPU evaluations (IMHO RTX4090 makes no sense without it), but I still don't think you do justice of how much of a driver it is in a purchasing decision NVIDIA is optimizing for. There are not a lot of people who can justify getting a 2500$ gaming laptop. A gaming laptop that doubles as a worktop? Sure. You actually need the power for Blender/IDE/compilation? well, 3500$ seems reasonable all of a sudden.
The same transition is taking place with ML, that everybody sees as essential to their future career, so they are willing to put the money in high-end GPUs, and NVIDIA is giving them a reason to go for the best and the latest.

i am keeping my GTX 1080 liquid Metal cooled, seems like there is nothign to repalce it yet for a decent price…

Imagine getting new Nvidia card in 2024 with those prices. Lol, lmao even.

LMG really not at the top of their game… except when it comes to selling screwdrivers. Where is 7900 xtx?

Nvidia obviously paid them well not to directly compare the 4080 Super to the 7900 XTX on the charts. This channel can't get any lower.

I liked my own comment 😢

Lazy video. Do better.

LTT we thought we got over bad and misleading reviews. BUT WHERE THE F*CK IS THE 7900XTX ????????????

Using russian propaganda for benchmarking, nicely done!