Awesome Tips Is 4000hz a scam?
4000hz polling rate is here! But is it even worth it? With a large amount of gaming mice coming out this year also jumping on the 4000hz train I decided to run a small test to see if there’s going to be any noticeable improvement in my aim. The result? It’s in the video.
4000hz polling rate is here! But is it even worth it? With a large amount of gaming mice coming out this year also jumping on the 4000hz train I decided to run a small test to see if there’s going to be any noticeable improvement in my aim. The result? It’s in the video.
Check out more reviews and gaming guides at
Video recorded by Chris, you can catch his streams at
#gamingmouse #review #razer
Deals for Days. Big home savings are happening now.
Different polling rates don't have that much of an effect on how it looks or feels. I'm pretty sure the higher polling rate mice being something that matters is because older mice even at the same polling rate as new ones were just bad and people assume it's because the polling rate is higher that it feels and looks idk more smooth but that is not the reason. The refresh rate on your monitor would have to be unreasonably high to notice the difference between 1000 and 4000hz like upwards of 5000+hz because it is not exactly the same as refresh rate on a monitor and even on a 4000hz monitor you wouldn't be able to tell which mouse was 1000 and 4000hz and maybe even 125 to 4000.
you should review the turtle mouse for april fools
Did you noticed a diff between 144hz and 240hz? I noticed the best 4k score was actually on 144, a trend or just that one?
Doesn't a 4KHz polling rate translate to a signal every 0.25ms and not every 0.125? It send every quater of a millisecond a signal (1/4th = 0.25) and not every eighth (1/8=0.125).
Sorry, I had to write it, as I have been using reddit way too much in recent weeks.
Надо было выбрать разные типы сценариев и ты в них должен быть очень стабилен. Там, где у тебя полное плато и скор уже не улучшается никак.
Well said:“Have fun instead torture“ I never supported guys who run for last gen in everything or getting achievements. Just have fun and enjoy it 😊
the methodology used only measures your performance in those sets, and considering that average reaction time around 250ms (gamers frequently present reaction times of 180~150ms) theres a whole plethora of other impactful variables to ones performance.
Your mouse "reaction time" being 1ms or 0.125ms is not where you should be looking to improve your performance, people should try to move faster, earlier and more precisely.
literally just get good mate, practice a lot and you gonna get out of bronze
disclaimer: the people mentioned on this comment are undefined subject and i do not hate the creator nor his methodology
HUH?
Like what is this supposed to mean?
Nobody believes that this will make you “aim” (if you can even call TS360 aim) better.
It’s just about smoothness ans combating studder on high refresh rate monitors.
The “nerd stuff” is the only aspect that means anything. The perceivable difference.
please do not hold this micro in the hand…
i love you with all of my heart you are such a beautiful man you warm my innards
Handsome tbh
I literally get 4 times more kills in valorant every round
You remember on stream you said that the uk would win the world cup? What do you say now.
I WANT THAT TURTLE MOUSE!!!!!
She: What size is he?
He: 4000Hz
i mean polling rate is always depending on how fast you move your mouse. if it says 1000hz you most likely have 800-900hz most of the time if you tracking something and probably even just 400-500hz if your more of a slower aimer (what a lot of people are). if you can profit from the 4000hz polling rate then probably if you have aim skills on lvl Voltaic Astra. probably ist just making all worse because 4k zould be more instable then 1k and consitency is key in aiming
Personally (and i notice really small things like debounce time settings, etc along with being high ranked in games i play top 500 ow immortal valorant) i noticed nearly no difference. Yes, there was a small difference but its so small it would never be able to be noticed in a blind test, honestly its so small i kind of question if its anything at all. All i can notice is the mouse is a little “snappier” considering it technically has lower input lag that’s probably exactly how its suppose to be, but its so small its really whatever. Not worth a 40$ dongle at all. Was on 240hz btw.
Its worth it if it comes with the mouse better is better right? But we should treat it like a newer sensor, great but not so great we inflate prices for it.
Isn’t 4000hz 0.25ms?
1000hz = 1ms report time
2000hz = 0.5ms report time
4000hz = 0.25ms report time
8000hz = 0.125ms report time
4000hz or even 8000hz is a gimmick , it only helps to drain the battery faster
I got 4khz and now i'm a pro, the mouse reporting 1000 times a second instead of 4000 was really holding me back
You spelt Data wrong smh