i can see one day we dont need the a second Chip (CPU) anymore. everything will be on one big chip like the apple m1 and on desktop it will be something like the gpu

7:35 based on this picture the data never goes through CPU. What if the PCIe drive is connected to a slot that used the PCIe lanes of the CPU instead of the chipset. Does it matter? If it does, how? Because I have my boot drive in the slot connected to the CPU and my Raid 0 storage (that I want to use for games) is connected via chipset.

Can't wait for DirectStorage on Forspoken!

2:53 * more than 4 times faster

Honestly, he has to do something about his weight. He's risking his life…

I hope many games will use this, as to elongate the lifespan, or, use-span of the, for example, Steam Deck

thats very strong thumbnail image

i like how you spell crave

It mattered in crash 1 and it was the right way almost from the start or we can make gpus with 256gb memory and load the whole game to gpu from the run

wait are you telling me that RAM is not as important as it used to be, still important but not as important

7:27 great, more closed proprietary bullcrap from nvidia.

Very detailed explanation learned alot

“Nearly 3 time faster”
Even though it’s over 4 times faster😂

I am fine waiting seconds to minutes or even an hour

That remember me PSO2, to move that thing from one to another drive. . . is a pain!! you have literally hunders of thousand files!! somes at 1kB and somes at 450MB, moving that by copy-paste takes like 10 hours to me! I had to do it on command-line by xcopy to do it fast and was like 45 minutes to copy that 100GB data. Is really fragmented but the way that game move even on olds GPU is wonderful. The only "loading screen" is when you use the teleport, all the world is fluid as you move through.

Would this also help if not entirely remove CPU bottlenecks for gaming?

what I been assuming with consoles vs PCs, that consoles have a lot of limitation compared to high end PCs, and devs/engineers sometimes think of really smart solutions to make their games squeeze more out of the console. when it get adopted in PC though, a lot more devs will just be more clumcy, and their games will require high end gaming PC to run smoothly. I for one was very surprised with how good GTA 5 looked in the PS3.

To see how UE5's Nanite takes advantage of this will be something to look forward to

That Unreal Tournament map brought back some of the best friend lan moments i have ever hade. We cranked up that AI difficulty to max and that was a difficulty that no other game have ever hade sense. For those who think that games can be difficult now try that and u quickly change your mind. That was the definition of Brutal.

All my games are on a SSD
But that's because I like the load times.. ( On the loading screens)
In overwatch 1 I was always able to quick lock my character but overwatch 2 they fix that that everyone goes into this Character select at the same time..

I miss the OG unreal tournament days 🙁

Sounds like it will reduce CPU load as well, which is always good

ps2 had a 4MB frame buffer btw, which is like 4MB of Vram. It was still able to beautifully render games like Silent Hill 3 (Within its resolution limitations.) Let that sink in.

Most people still use regular old HDD even for gaming and only use a SSD as their boot drive. This could make future games unplayable if that tech is mandatory. While SSD Prices have droped alot i am still not comfortable to pay 139,79€ for a SSD which in this case is only rated for 2100mb/s which might not even be enough for games that make this tech mandatory.

Just to compare price a HDD is 47,98€ and fine for most games without such a tech.

Since most gamedevs want their games to be playable by the majority of community i doubt we gonna see this tech in the games unless SSD Prices drop to the same level mechanical drives are.

I hope it doesnt require the newest Gen of M.2 SSD`s…