1672134855_maxresdefault.jpg

Amazing Products TV How the Ocean Could Power Our Homes

Awesome Tips How the Ocean Could Power Our Homes



We spoke to the co-founder and CEO of Eco Wave Power to learn about how their floaters convert waves into energy.

Subscribe to CNET:
Never miss a deal again! See CNET’s browser extension 👉
Follow us on TikTok:
Follow us on Instagram:
Follow us on Twitter:
Like us on Facebook:

#Waves #Energy #Power

Deals for Days. Big home savings are happening now.


Belkin Store – Exclusive Product Offers

Previous Post
1672134919_maxresdefault.jpg
Kitchens and Appliances

Amazing Products 5 Best Toasters on Amazon 2021

Next Post
1672134755_maxresdefault.jpg
Amazing Gaming Products

Amazing Products MSI Pro Cast#38 – How to enable TPM and Secure Boot for Windows 11? | Gaming Motherboard | MSI

Comments

    • J J
    • December 27, 2022

    Wonder if they could be installed on the sides of cruise ships.Then,they could power the ship and maybe serve as lifeboats,if the ship goes down.

  1. Those are going to rust and get destroyed by the waves.

  2. To make it cost efficient it need to operate for decades without much maintenance.
    Salt water is a very difficult environment. But their system is simple and use standard component, maybe it’s cost effective in certain locations.

  3. Movement of units can contributes to material fatique over time. Eventually, the supporting structure will cracked up/collapsed

  4. I didnt see any floaters, usually brown in colour, eaten by surfers

  5. Wave Energy megawatts 👍

  6. Someone tried the exact same thing here in Wollongong Australia… FAILED.. Why?
    Well, like all yachts and ships… little things grow on what is beneath the water… so they get slipped, bum clean, and back in water…
    those floats would need to be taken out of the water, to get their bums cleaned, using co2 blurting machinery…
    And because of the underwater Growth they would be heavier, and less efficient..

  7. Like Paul C. Sachse Jr. said, looks quite probably a maintenance huge regular cost. And I add to that, what about tides? No explanation is given on that, but they seem to be fixed structures. Consider 2 metres water level difference there times a day and one wonders how the system can perform and thus influencing eficiency.

  8. Awsome idea!
    When waves are smaller, a wave generating chamber could create larger waves by filling and releasing water passively using a free moving vertical butterfly valve system.

  9. Industrial civilisation is unsustainable, sorry. The sooner we adapt to that reality the less traumatic the transition will be. Many will profit from grifting onto the denial of that fact, unless we destroy ourselves first.

  10. Looking forward to this technology coming to Wichita, Kansas.

  11. Egyptian Red Sea is not good enough. No big waves. Egyptian Mediterranean is certainly a good place to have.

  12. can you possibly get your camera people to hold the camera steady for long enough to actually see it? and if they can do that, can you get your editors to not cut away to a different shaky shot after 1.5 seconds?

  13. I love to see this technology tested in Wisconsin, along the shores of Lake Michigan.

  14. what does the phrase "renewable energy" even mean? The energy itself is just that – energy. It's not "renewable" no matter how you split it. The device isn't "renewable" either. Its gonna rust out and be tossed in the landfill soon as well. Modular nuclear powerplants are where its at. I like the idea of harvesting energy from earth processes, but their usefulness extends to edge cases. We either need to develop highly efficient sources of mass power (i.e. nuclear) or go back to horse and buggy. Seems anything in-between is just 6th grade science experiments.

  15. Ten years ago I had the opportunity to achieve a study to optimizing a wave energy converter quite similar to this one, but we could not get financiation to build it. I am glad that our idea was not so crazy and someone else can bring it to the reality.

  16. Someone's gonna complain that they're eyesores and ruin it for everyone.

  17. Seems like little gain for what it takes but not sure

  18. While it looks neat, I'm sure it's instantly dwarfed by nuclear.

    Seriously, we need to go back to nuclear. The modern, safe kind.

    • 1 1
    • December 27, 2022

    Anything to get away from fossil fuels, especially oil

  19. I'm down for having those things. 50% ain't too bad. They said one floater powers 10 households. What if those households have electric cars? And can we use the electricity for electrolysis instead so that we can make clean hydrogen from the water also.

  20. The floaters look like they are metal. Seems like they should be made of fiberglass since sea water is so corrosive to metal.

  21. way too bulky and looks like we would have to recycle cars to build these. I think current tech used to harvest water energy is good enough

  22. I’d love to see more of them!

  23. כבוד

  24. Salt + 1 year

    • P C
    • December 27, 2022

    Great keep going

  25. So is CNET trying to steal the ‘N’ from the Apple News logo? lol

  26. Maybe there is hope after all 🙂 what an innovation

  27. Awesome. Can't call it a floater though.

  28. You could put them off the east and left coast of America

    People will love it

  29. cool

    • Wf2v
    • December 27, 2022

    Hydraulic oil fluid leaked into the water. Another brilliant idea from the greenies.

  30. During this whole video, no one mentioned how much energy these things are actually producing or how much it costs in $/kwh. Until you see those figures, you can consider this greenwashing.

  31. Can’t we just get Gooble Boxes already?

  32. Love CNET ❤️

  33. Floating Point Operation, literally

Leave a Reply