https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvqrlgKuowEThis is so simple it could very well be revolutionary, of course they will need to smooth the rough corners, but this is amazing.

I can hear Nvidia groaning.

2:17 Don't play with my dreams (am playing with 15fps/with dips to 5 on 1080p)

Adam clearly guessed the 60 fps right

The question is whether the artifacts can be smoothed down so that 60fps repro can be less distracting yet smoother than 60 fps. As of yet, i'd still stick to unstretched laggy 60. Maybe the algorithm can do "75%" improvement, so that artifacts are smaller and it still lags, but less

"You know which one I'm talking about., All of them!" 😂🤣

I LOVE IT AND IT SHOULD BE AN OPTION ON PC SO U CAN TURN IT ON IF YOU WANT

This can make a huge difference to desktop gaming for sure, mostly in the budget and aging mid-tier builds, but can you imagine what this could do for the Steam Deck and other handhelds? Not just make games smoother, but the amount of battery life this could save would be a huge advantage. Would love to see how far this tech can be pushed and one day even become as widely adopted as DLSS and FSR

I played Half-Life Alyx on a 970 and an i5, and that was only possible thanks to async re-projection.

I always wondered why there was nothing similar in the monitor space.

0:56 VR Kanojo 😆

Because they didn't bother to implement it in the GPU drivers and devs of games have other worries. Game engine devs didn't bother… Nvidia has it basically now with DLSS3 frame generation, but they probably do it a more overkill AI way to make it higher quality than a simple solution of a warp. The problem is getting the duopoly to implement driver features so that features work everywhere not only in 1 app/game.

If the frames are always behind (because the gpu hasn't sent a frame for a while) wouldn't that nerf competitive games for some folks, even if their inputs are technically responsive? They would still be behind the location of their opponent in a network game.

"Hi, I'm Mark, Ummm" Mark. 😆🤣😆🤣

This tech is insanely cool! I wonder if it would be possible for reprojection to be applied selectively on different things in a scene? So maybe things more sensitive to artifacting – like characters and objects – could be rendered normally, but things less sensitive to artifacting – like the environment or maybe buildings – could take advantage of asynchronous reprojection.

Or alternatively, since they mentioned that only 7° or something of a human's field of view is very sharp and the rest is mostly peripheral, render normally for objects in the center of the view and use reprojection for things more towards the edges.

Neither would perform as well as full asynchronous reprojection, but if it's possible then I would imagine they could help a lot to improve the perceived quality.

I would take that over fake frames any day.

I thought this was VR when I first clicked because VR has had this since 2017 at least. Awesome to see this finally make its way to the flatscreen 😀

I want Jake's shirt!! Where can I get one!?

this is why you may sometimes get weird effect using pc with headsets, thanks!

Just add head bobbing to racing. Shaking or staggering back and forth when changing speed. But in one place, like turning a rifle in shooters. And here you have the movement of the camera and the steering wheel, which will give the feeling of a lot of FPS.

Can we start to implement this now please. I have a 2060 but i still want this to help extend the life of my graphics card.

So i should burn my Gsync screen with fire?

So wat is this called?

Tell Linus to stop spending all his money on PCs and to invest in a comb.

lol

To be honest, my first thoughts were "wonder if it works on VR" due to poor performance in PCVR. Sorta sad that my poor experience is even already using this trick.